[an error occurred while processing this directive]


[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Thursday, June 9, 2005 Edition
For a partial list of distribution outlets, click here.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Jon Gaskell: Worst timing ever

Witherspoon's flirting is beyond contemptible
jon@dmcityview.com

Former Des Moines School Board member Graham Gillette let me have it after I wrote an editorial stating, in part, that I thought it took some guts for Des Moines School District officials, particularly superintendent Eric Witherspoon, to decide to shut down schools. A dying rural Iowa, I strongly feel, gets too big a piece of the state's pie, while metro schools are forced to scavenge. Gillette told me he agrees that metro schools should get more, but he said Witherspoon and Co. didn't do anything other than what they had to when they announced they would be closing some schools down, while not fixing up a handful of others. The jig, he told me, was up. There was no money left. The board knew it and couldn't pretend any longer, so the board pulled the plug.

Still, I told Gillette that it's never easy to stand up and do something that will be received as wildly unpopular. Closing schools, no matter the financial hardship or how it came to be or whose fault it was, is not an easy decision to make because the backlash can be murderous. Just ask the weaklings in the legislature who refuse to take up the issue, but instead choose to dance around it by insisting that the matter is local. So I maintained that regardless of the minutiae, school leaders were standing up and beginning the painful process of taking their licks.

Except, as it turns out, Witherspoon.

When the going gets tough, the tough get going - just not to Indianapolis. However, someone forgot to tell Witherspoon. And so I was a little surprised when someone told me last week that he was interviewing for a top job there. After all, the captain of a sinking ship does everything he can to keep the ship afloat, especially when he's the one who helped ram it into the iceberg. And if there's no saving the ship, and the captain truly feels the need to disembark, he probably shouldn't be the first one in the lifeboat. Why? Well, for starters, it makes the rest of us feel like maybe, just maybe, we really aren't all in this together. I mean, what's next, him sending his kids to private school?

Yeah, yeah, I know, he's staying and whatnot, but there is no way in hell this cannot leave a bad taste in everyone's mouth. Like Witherspoon or not, can you still trust that he is looking out for what's best for our children, especially during the worst of times, when the temptation to flee is at its peak? Not even for a second. How could you with what you know of him and his dubious character?

Board member Ako Abdul Samad told The Des Moines Register this past weekend "when opportunity talks, you have to weigh it." And although I'm not quite sure if that's the way that particular saying goes, I don't believe Ako for one second. All cheerleading aside, this is more than some guy checking out a career opportunity. This is treachery at its worst. We saw the true Eric Witherspoon when he even flirted with the idea of heading "back home." The guy's from Florida for Christ's sake, and yet the Register has school officials "breathing a sigh of relief" because Witherspoon said he has unfinished business here in Des Moines.

What, he didn't know about this unfinished business before heading over for his first interview?

Say he made the mess, call him a liar, an idiot, or maintain that he's on his knees to big business types, whatever. To me, that's all neither here nor there. To me, Witherspoon showed us exactly how truly little we mean to him when we needed to feel so much more - when we needed to feel the most. And I'm not so sure he can ever un-ring this bell.

With people lining up against him to question not only his decision-making but his overall power, as well, Witherspoon needed to try to be the voice of reason, needed to be doing some serious damage control. So what's he do? He winds up the wrecking ball he has aimed at Edmunds Academy and starts swinging it at his own already well-tarnished image. Who cares whether he left us for good or not? Who cares that he came whimpering back? The intent is out in the open. And all I can wonder is: what about the next crisis? Will he go looking for cover then, too?

To be honest, maybe we shouldn't bother with the wait-and-see approach. Maybe we should start doing a little interviewing of our own. If we're not quite good enough for Witherspoon - despite his doing his best Dorothy, clicking his heels together and saying, "There's no place like Des Moines" - then who's to say he's good enough for us? It's not as if we could bring someone in who could screw things up anymore than they are now. I'm not saying it's entirely his fault, but if we have to embrace this new way of thinking regarding our deteriorating district, then my question is why not begin with a new head thinker to help us along? Perhaps someone who's loyal. It couldn't hurt. CV

Comment on this story | Return to top

[an error occurred while processing this directive]