By Shane Goodman shane@dmcityview.com

Technology to feed has a cost

Know the difference between genetic engineering, genetically modified organisms, transgenic or pharma-crops? Me neither. But I do know that these new sciences have resulted in the greatest food production in all of human history. And that without these technologies, large numbers of people would not have sufficient food.

The World Food Prize (WFP) is an award for "achievements that significantly increase the quality, quantity or availability of food in the world," and its foundation is based right here in Des Moines. What began as a simple vision of Iowa native Norman Borlaug is now recognized internationally and supported heavily by local businessman and philanthropist John Ruan. From most perspectives, it is wonderful recognition for those who are working to prevent world hunger. According to the WFP Web site, the Prize recognizes "contributions in any field involved in the world food supply - food and agriculture science and technology, manufacturing, marketing, nutrition, economics, poverty alleviation, political leadership and the social sciences."

The Prize recognizes and salutes not only what has been done to improve the world food supply, but also looks to what can be achieved in years ahead. In recent years, though, about one in four of the Prizes has gone to genetic engineering or biotech breakthroughs. And that concerns some.

Jim Duncan, our resident food critic, talked with several of the people who have become frustrated with the pomp and circumstance of the WFP, people who believe that sustainable agriculture has more long-term solutions for feeding the world than the latest genetic fad. And while most embrace these technologies, some are asking where the trend will take us. And they think you should be concerned with the answer.

Thanks for reading.

Comment on this story | Return to top